UK Economy Beats Forecasts With 0.4% July Growth — But Can Tech-Led Momentum Survive Autumn?
The headline number looks like a broad recovery. The detail underneath shows something narrower: a handful of business-services industries doing the heavy lifting while consumer-facing sectors kept shrinking.
Marcus Oyelaran
Economics Editor
UK GDP grew 0.4% in July, comfortably beating a consensus forecast of no growth at all, and pushing annual growth to 1.6% — the fastest pace since February 2025. Set against a Bank of England forecast, published just weeks earlier, that projected underlying growth slowing to around zero this quarter, that's a genuinely striking beat. It is not, on its own, evidence that the broader growth picture has changed. The composition of July's expansion tells a narrower, more specific story than the headline number alone suggests.
Growth came almost entirely from a small number of business-services industries, not from a broad-based pickup in economic activity. Administrative and support services rose 3.7% on the month, the largest single positive contribution to growth. Information and communication output rose 2.4%, driven by a 3.5% jump in computer programming, consultancy and related activities specifically. The ONS was explicit about what's sitting behind that number: many of the businesses reporting the highest turnover in that sector in July were involved in artificial intelligence and cloud computing. The statistics office was equally explicit about the limits of that finding — higher sales at AI-exposed firms shows those firms are selling more, not that the businesses buying from them have become measurably more productive as a result. It's a real distinction, and one easy to lose in a headline that simply credits an 'AI boom'.
Set against that strength, other parts of the economy kept contracting. Consumer-facing services fell 0.4% in July, and wholesale and retail trade made the largest negative contribution to the month's output, with the narrower wholesale trade component — excluding motor vehicles specifically — falling 1.4%. Retail trade excluding motor vehicles was down 0.5% on the month, only partly offset by a 2.6% rise in accommodation. Manufacturing and industrial production rose a modest 0.2% overall, itself a mixed picture: manufacturing gains were partly offset by falls in mining and in electricity and gas supply. The plain read is a two-speed economy: a narrow band of business and professional services expanding briskly, while consumer-facing and traditional trade sectors continued to struggle under the weight of higher borrowing costs and squeezed household budgets.
The tension with the Bank of England's own thinking is real and worth being precise about, since it involves two different measures rather than one straightforward contradiction. The Bank's July Monetary Policy Report projected its own "underlying GDP growth" indicator — a survey-based measure the Bank uses to filter out short-term noise in the official data — would slow to around 0% in the third quarter, citing the drag from ongoing global conflict-related pressures on demand. July's 0.4% is the official, single-month headline figure, not the Bank's underlying measure, so the two aren't strictly the same number — but a strong headline print does complicate the more downbeat internal read the Bank was working from as recently as July, and will be one data point among several the Monetary Policy Committee weighs at its next meeting.
Economists reacting to the release were similarly split between genuine encouragement and caution about reading too much into one month. Martin Beck, chief economist at WPI Strategy, described the kind of productivity-enhancing spending behind the tech and business-services strength as exactly what the UK economy needs more of. PwC's chief economist Barret Kupelian pointed to broader signs of AI's imprint across professional services, information technology and administrative activities specifically as the sectors most exposed to that investment. Neither framed a single month's data as settling the question of whether the wider economy has genuinely turned a corner.
That caution is worth taking seriously on its own statistical terms, not just as a rhetorical hedge. ONS monthly GDP estimates are consistently subject to revision — the current July figure remains open for revision when the full time series reopens on 15 October, alongside the quarterly national accounts update due 30 September. A single strong month sitting inside an otherwise more modest three-month trend (GDP rose 0.4% over the three months to July compared with the three months to April, level with the prior three-month period, not accelerating from it) is a normal feature of a noisy data series, not necessarily the start of a new trend.
Whether the momentum in business and professional services can offset the headwinds still facing the UK economy through autumn is the real open question the July print doesn't resolve on its own. Persistent gilt market yield volatility, energy price pressure, and corporate caution ahead of the 28 October Budget all remain live risks capable of weighing on both the sectors driving July's growth and the ones already struggling. The next labour market data, August's trade figures, and the Bank of England's next policy decision will say considerably more about whether July was the start of something durable or a strong month sitting inside a still-fragile broader picture.